Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership (CSCP) promotes child safety through multi-agency collaboration, training, and safeguarding resources to protect children from harm and improve safeguarding practices across Croydon. সুরক্ষা সকলের। আপনি কি শিশুর নিরাপত্তা নিয়ে চিন্তিত? Voice of Child Conference - 13th October 2026 Learn more সাম্প্রতিক খবর বহু-সংস্থার সহযোগিতার মাধ্যমে, আমরা সম্মুখ সারির অনুশীলন উন্নত করার জন্য প্রশিক্ষণ কর্মসূচি, সুরক্ষা নীতি এবং সচেতনতা প্রচারণা তৈরি করি। Search for guidance আমাদের লক্ষ্য ক্রয়ডন সেফগার্ডিং চিলড্রেন পার্টনারশিপ (CSCP) শিশুদের সুরক্ষার জন্য প্রতিশ্রুতিবদ্ধ যাতে প্রতিটি শিশু নিরাপদ, সমর্থিত এবং ক্ষতিমুক্তভাবে বেড়ে ওঠে। Learn more about CSCP অংশ নিন আমি একটি অনুচ্ছেদ। আপনার নিজস্ব লেখা যোগ করতে এবং আমাকে সম্পাদনা করতে এখানে ক্লিক করুন। এটা সহজ। আপনার নিজস্ব বিষয়বস্তু যোগ করতে এবং ফন্টে পরিবর্তন করতে কেবল "টেক্সট সম্পাদনা করুন" এ ক্লিক করুন অথবা আমাকে ডাবল ক্লিক করুন। Find a course সাম্প্রতিক খবর আমি একটি অনুচ্ছেদ। আপনার নিজস্ব লেখা যোগ করতে এবং আমাকে সম্পাদনা করতে এখানে ক্লিক করুন। এটা সহজ। আপনার নিজস্ব বিষয়বস্তু যোগ করতে এবং ফন্টে পরিবর্তন করতে কেবল "টেক্সট সম্পাদনা করুন" এ ক্লিক করুন অথবা আমাকে ডাবল ক্লিক করুন। Find a local review Support for Every Child Referral Guidance Here Unsure if your situation meets the referral threshold? We have dedicated guidance and tools to help you understand the process and provide the necessary support for safeguarding children in Croydon. Get Help Now Latest News 1 2 3 ... 23 1 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 23 New Temporary Accommodation Notification Duty (England) Read more Voice of the Child Conference 2026 Back by data - Be a part of this important conversation Read more Information Sharing Duty 2026 Learning Resources for Partner Agencies Read more আমাদের অংশীদাররা

Croydon's multi-agency approach to identifying, preventing, and responding to child neglect, with key indicators and practice guidance. Croydon Neglect Strategy Neglect strategy The Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership (CSCP) is committed to protecting children and young people from neglect and ensuring they have the opportunity to thrive. Neglect is the most common form of child abuse in the UK, and its impact can be profound and long-lasting. Our strategy focuses on early identification, effective intervention, and collaborative working to safeguard children and support families. Southwest London (SWL) Neglect Strategy The SWL Neglect Strategy represents a collaborative effort across Croydon, Kingston and Richmond, Merton, and Wandsworth Safeguarding Children Partnerships to address child neglect. This strategy emphasises: A child-centred approach, ensuring the voice of the child is heard in all decisions. Early intervention and prevention, focusing on identifying risks and providing support before neglect escalates. Multi-agency collaboration, bringing together professionals from health, education, social care, and other sectors to safeguard children effectively. Download Neglect Strategy In addition to the Neglect Strategy, we encourage practitioners to read the Safeguarding Practice Reviews related to neglect. These reviews offer valuable insights into recognising and responding to neglect, highlighting real-life learning to inform and improve multi-agency practice. To support this, we’ve developed a series of 7-Minute Briefings to accompany the full reviews—concise, accessible resources that highlight key learning points and offer practical guidance. Ben (2022)– 7-Minute Briefing | Read the full review⭧ This review examines the tragic death of a two-year-old boy, highlighting systemic challenges in identifying and addressing neglect in early childhood. Ben's mother, a young first-time parent with a history of adverse childhood experiences and low-level depression, struggled to engage with support services. Carl & Max (2022) – 7-Minute Briefing | Read the full review⭧ This review examines the tragic case of Carl, a 16-year-old who was fatally stabbed. The review highlights how chronic neglect—manifested through repeated homelessness, unstable housing, and prolonged absence from education—significantly impacted Carl's wellbeing and development. These materials are designed to help practitioners reflect on their own practice and drive better outcomes for children at risk of neglect. Child Wellbeing Tool The CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool is designed to support practitioners in assessing and addressing the needs of children and young people across Croydon. This tool aligns with the Southwest London (SWL) Neglect Strategy and provides a structured, evidence-based approach to identifying and responding to concerns about child neglect. The Child Wellbeing Tool focuses on four key areas of a child’s life: Reviews CSCP Child Wellbeing tool The tool is designed to complement existing frameworks, such as the Graded Care Profile 2 (GCP2), and should be used alongside it when neglect is suspected or identified. It supports practitioners in making consistent, child-centred decisions and provides clear guidance on next steps based on the level of need identified. What difference will the tool make? Improve Early Identification: Help practitioners identify concerns about neglect and other wellbeing issues at an early stage, enabling timely intervention. Standardise Assessments: Provide a consistent, evidence-based framework for assessing children’s needs across agencies. Enhance Collaboration: Support multi-agency working by providing a shared language and approach to safeguarding. Empower Practitioners: Offer clear guidance on next steps, ensuring children and families receive the right support at the right time. Focus on the Child’s Voice: Ensure the child’s experiences and needs are central to all assessments and interventions. The SWL Neglect Strategy and CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool is designed for all professionals working with children and families, including: Social workers Health visitors School staff (e.g., teachers, designated safeguarding leads) Early years practitioners Police and housing officers Voluntary and community sector workers It is particularly useful for practitioners who: Have concerns about a child’s wellbeing. Need to assess the level of support required for a child or family. Are involved in multi-agency safeguarding work. Next Steps If you have concerns about a child’s wellbeing or suspect neglect: If you are a not a licensed GCP2 practitioner, use the CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool to assess the child’s needs and determine the level of support required. If you are a licensed GCP2 practitioner, use the GCP2 Tool for a detailed assessment of care quality where neglect is suspected. Contact MASH Consultation Line for advice and support, call 0208 726 6000, Option 1. If a referral to Children's Social Care or Early Help is required, please complete a Multi-agency Referral Form For non-urgent support needs refer families to the Croydon Early Help directory for information of voluntary, community and faith organisations who can also offer support some advice. Access CSCP Reviews and briefings for additional guidance on specific aspects of neglect. Further reading and resources Download Tool CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool Practitioner Guide Download CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool Part A Download CSCP Child Wellbeing Tool Part B Download Further Reading and Resources Strengthen Your Safeguarding Practice – Find a course here ⭧ The NSPCC Graded Care Profile 2 Watch this short video to hear directly from professionals about the impact of GCP2: Watch here ⭧ Frequently Asked Questions ⭧ NSPCC - GCP2 Background ⭧ Become a licensed GCP2 Practitioner ⭧ London Safeguarding Children Procedures - Neglect Click here to view guidance ⭧ Become a GCP2 licensed practitioner Book the eLearning course

Discover the key safeguarding procedures UK for safe, lawful information sharing to protect children and enhance welfare efforts. Multi-agency information sharing duty New statutory duty from 30 September 2026 The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 amended the Children Act 2004 to introduce a statutory information sharing duty. Relevant safeguarding and welfare information must be shared where the statutory tests are met. Practitioners do not need to wait until a child reaches a statutory safeguarding threshold. This video provides a concise overview of the Information Sharing Duty, helping practitioners understand when, why, and how information should be shared to support effective safeguarding and promote better outcomes for children and families. Download briefing Effective information sharing is essential to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. It enables practitioners to build a fuller picture of a child’s circumstances, identify emerging needs, recognise cumulative or contextual risk and coordinate appropriate support. The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 introduced a new statutory information sharing duty through section 16LA of the Children Act 2004. The duty comes into force on 30 September 2026. The duty provides greater clarity about when relevant information must be shared between organisations involved in safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. It applies not only where there is a risk of significant harm, but also where information may support early identification of need, prevention, assessment or support. There is no requirement for a child to meet a particular statutory threshold before relevant information can be shared. The new duty works alongside, and does not replace, existing safeguarding procedures, Working Together to Safeguard Children , Keeping Children Safe in Education and data protection legislation . Who does the duty apply to? The statutory duty applies to specified safeguarding organisations, including local authorities, Integrated Care Boards, NHS trusts, police, probation, youth justice services, designated education and childcare agencies, and organisations providing relevant safeguarding services on their behalf. Other organisations and practitioners may not themselves fall directly within section 16LA but should use the guidance as good safeguarding practice and continue to follow local safeguarding procedures. When must information be shared? Where an organisation covered by the duty: holds information about a child, or another person connected to that child; considers that information relevant to safeguarding or promoting the child's welfare; and considers that sharing it may help another relevant organisation assess need or risk, make a decision, provide support or take safeguarding action, the information must be shared , subject to the limited detriment exception described below. The duty also applies when relevant information is requested by another organisation covered by the legislation. This includes information relating to: emerging or unmet need early help and prevention abuse, neglect or exploitation contextual and extra-familial harm risks a child may pose to other children cumulative or historical concerns patterns of behaviour or incidents relevant information about parents, carers, siblings, peers or other adults connected to the child. Information should therefore not be considered in isolation. Information that appears limited within one organisation may become significant when combined with information held elsewhere. There is no safeguarding threshold for information sharing Practitioners do not need to wait until a child meets the threshold for statutory intervention or a section 47 enquiry. The new duty specifically addresses this misconception. Relevant information should be shared where it may help identify need, prevent concerns escalating, provide support or safeguard and promote the welfare of a child. Consent and working openly with families Consent is not normally required in order to share information under the statutory information sharing duty. However, this does not mean that families should routinely be excluded from information-sharing decisions. Practitioners should be open and transparent with children and families wherever it is safe and appropriate to do so, explaining what information is being shared and why. Lack of consent, parental objection, fear of complaint or practitioner uncertainty are not, by themselves, reasons to withhold relevant information where the statutory duty applies. Where informing a child or family could increase risk, prejudice safeguarding activity or otherwise be inappropriate, practitioners should use professional judgement and record the reasons for their decision. Data protection does not prevent appropriate safeguarding information sharing UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 continue to apply. Practitioners must ensure that information sharing is lawful, fair, relevant, accurate, proportionate and secure. However, data protection legislation should not normally prevent information being shared where it is necessary to safeguard or promote a child's welfare. A formal Data Sharing Agreement does not have to be in place before relevant information can be shared under the duty. The limited exception: detriment to the child There is a very limited exception to the duty. Information does not have to be shared where, through professional judgement, the practitioner determines that sharing the information would be more detrimental to the child than not sharing it. This should be rare. Examples may include circumstances where disclosure could: place the child at immediate risk of harm; seriously interfere with an ongoing police investigation in a way that would create greater risk to a child; or breach restrictions imposed by the Family Court or High Court. Practitioners should consider whether the risk can instead be reduced by limiting, sanitising or restricting the information shared. Where information is withheld on this basis, the decision and rationale should be clearly recorded and reviewed. A simple decision-making test Before sharing, practitioners should consider three questions: 1. Relevance Is the information relevant to safeguarding or promoting the child's welfare? 2. May it help? Could sharing the information help another relevant organisation assess need or risk, make a decision, provide support or take action? 3. Detriment Would sharing cause greater detriment to the child than not sharing it, and could any potential harm be mitigated? If the first two tests are met and the limited detriment exception does not apply, the information should be shared. Information about other people Relevant safeguarding information may relate to someone other than the child. This could include information about a parent, carer, sibling, peer, partner or another adult connected to the child's life. Where that information is relevant to understanding the child's safety or welfare and the statutory criteria are met, it must be shared appropriately. This is particularly important where different agencies hold separate pieces of information which, when brought together, reveal a pattern of vulnerability or risk. Recording decisions Practitioners should record: what information was shared; who it was shared with; why the information was considered relevant; how sharing could support safeguarding or promote the child's welfare; whether the child or family was informed; any decision not to inform them and the rationale; any decision to withhold information because sharing would cause greater detriment to the child; and any advice or management oversight obtained where appropriate. Professional judgement remains important, but uncertainty should not create delay. Practitioners should seek prompt advice from their safeguarding lead, manager, Data Protection Officer or Caldicott Guardian where necessary. Sharing across geographical boundaries Relevant information must not be lost because a child moves between local authority or organisational boundaries within England. Where the statutory criteria are met, organisations should share relevant information with the appropriate organisation in the child's new area. The absence of an established Data Sharing Agreement should not prevent this. Anti-discriminatory practice Information sharing should be informed by anti-racist, anti-discriminatory and culturally aware practice. Practitioners should remain alert to how assumptions, bias, stereotypes and language can influence the interpretation and recording of information. Information shared should be relevant and proportionate, with unnecessary stigmatising descriptions, identity labels or historical information avoided. Escalation and professional challenge If relevant safeguarding information is being withheld because of an incorrect interpretation of consent, confidentiality or data protection law, practitioners should challenge this through their organisation's safeguarding and management arrangements. Where disagreement cannot be resolved, practitioners should use the CSCP Escalatio n and Resolution Policy . Information sharing is part of safeguarding practice - not optional extra From 30 September 2026, organisations covered by section 16LA of the Children Act 2004 have a statutory duty to share relevant information where it may help another relevant organisation safeguard or promote the welfare of a child. There is no safeguarding threshold that must be reached before information can be shared. The duty includes early help, prevention, emerging need and welfare concerns. Do not wait to be asked. Organisations and practitioners should be proactive in identifying and sharing relevant information. Information about parents, carers, peers and other people connected to a child may also need to be shared where it is relevant to the child's safety or welfare. Consent is not normally required where information is being shared under the statutory duty, although practitioners should work openly with children and families wherever it is safe and appropriate. Data protection is not a reason to withhold relevant safeguarding information . Information must still be shared lawfully, securely, accurately and proportionately. Information should only be withheld in very limited circumstances where sharing would cause greater detriment to the child than not sharing it. When deciding what to share, ask: Is it relevant? Could it help? Would sharing cause greater detriment? Record what was shared, with whom and why, record the rationale for any decision not to share. If uncertainty is causing delay, seek advice and escalate rather than doing nothing.

Explore the findings from the CSCP Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) audit, including key learning, practice recommendations and resources to strengthen multi-agency safeguarding. Learning from Audits Theme: Child Sexual Abuse Recognising the Signs Beyond Disclosure Following two multi-agency audits, the following information aims to provide practitioners with key findings, practical guidance, and essential resources to better identify, support, and safeguard children affected by Domestic Abuse (DA). Key Learning Themes 1 Identification & Disclosure Disclosure is uncommon. Children often disclose gradually, partially, retract disclosures or never disclose at all. Recognise indicators. Self-harm, emotional distress, behavioural change, poor attendance and family instability should all prompt professional curiosity. Ask difficult questions. Practitioners should feel confident discussing sexual abuse when concerns arise rather than waiting for evidence to emerge. 2 Multi-Agency Working Information sharing remains inconsistent . Agencies did not always share information or attend key safeguarding meetings. Cross-borough working creates additional risk. Children educated or supported outside Croydon require particularly robust communication between agencies. Good recording matters. Clear chronologies help practitioners understand cumulative risk and support effective decision-making. 3 Child's Voice & Lived Experience Listen beyond the disclosure. Children's experiences should shape assessments, plans and interventions. Understand daily life . School attendance, relationships, emotional wellbeing and family circumstances all contribute to understanding risk. The child's voice should influence decisions, not simply be recorded. 4 Culture, Diversity & Professional Curiosity Explore cultural influences sensitively. Stigma, family expectations and community pressures may affect disclosure and engagement. Remain professionally curious. Avoid assumptions or over-reliance on parental accounts. Consider the whole context before reaching safeguarding decisions. 5 Risk Assessment & Access to Support Risk assessments were inconsisten t, even where significant indicators of harm existed. Children should not lose support because criminal thresholds are not met. Know local pathways . Delays accessing specialist services increase safeguarding risk and require active oversight. How agencies can improve practice To address the audit findings, agencies must adopt a proactive, trauma-informed approach. The following suggestions are structured around the three pillars of improvement: Foundation, Action , and Impact , which outline key areas for local practice improvement. Pillar 1: Earlier Identification Recognise vulnerability Look beyond disclosure. Recognise cumulative indicators of abuse. Strengthen professional curiosity through supervision. Improve confidence Build practitioner confidence to discuss Child Sexual Abuse directly. Make effective use of CSA training and learning opportunities. Pillar 2: Strengthen Partnership Working Improve information sharing Ensure all relevant agencies contribute to safeguarding discussions. Develop accurate chronologies. Strengthen cross-borough communication. Consistent decision-making Use structured risk assessment. Clearly record rationale for decisions. Maintain oversight when cases step down. Pillar 3: Keep the Child at the Centre Hear the child's lived experience Ensure children's views influence planning. Consider emotional wellbeing alongside physical safety. Explore culture, identity and family context. Maintain support Continue safeguarding activity even where disclosures are withdrawn or police investigations do not progress. Monitor children waiting for specialist support. Further Resources Croydon Resources Safeguarding Children Training⭧ National Guidance I wanted Them All to Notice⭧ - The national Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel report examining how professionals identify and respond to child sexual abuse, with recommendations to strengthen safeguarding practice. Child Sexual Abuse Centre⭧ - Evidence-based guidance, research and practical resources to help professionals recognise, respond to and prevent child sexual abuse. Sexual abuse | NSPCC⭧ - Information and guidance on recognising the signs of child sexual abuse, supporting children and families, and responding to concerns. London Safeguarding Children Procedure: Sexual Abuse⭧ - Pan-London multi-agency procedures outlining how professionals should respond to concerns about child sexual abuse and protect children at risk. Pre-Trial Resources – Bluestar Project ⭧ - Practical resources to help children, young people and their families understand the criminal justice process and prepare for giving evidence in court.

Explore the Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership newsletter archive for updates, training opportunities, and insights into safeguarding initiatives supporting children and families in Croydon. Newsletter Library Stay connected and informed with our archived newsletters, where you can access key updates on the latest safeguarding news from the CSCP. These newsletters are a valuable resource to help stay abreast of important developments and insights. We encourage you to explore the archives and keep your knowledge current. Your engagement is essential in fostering a safe community. Click on the date below to view the newsletter for the respective month. January 2026 February 2026 March 2026 April 2026 May 2026 June 2026 July 2026 August 2026 CSCP Practice Week 2026 September 2026

Access quick, easy-to-read 7-minute briefings on key safeguarding topics. Ideal for busy practitioners needing bite-sized learning and updates. Brie fi ngs Hub আমি একটা অনুচ্ছেদ। এখানে ক্লিক করে নিজের লেখা যোগ করুন এবং আমাকে এডিট করুন। এটা সহজ। শুধু "Edit Text" এ ক্লিক করুন অথবা আপনার নিজস্ব কন্টেন্ট যোগ করতে এবং ফন্টে পরিবর্তন করতে আমাকে ডাবল ক্লিক করুন। আপনার পৃষ্ঠায় যেকোনো জায়গায় আমাকে টেনে আনতে দ্বিধা করবেন না। আমি আপনার জন্য একটি দুর্দান্ত জায়গা যেখানে আপনি গল্প বলতে পারেন এবং আপনার ব্যবহারকারীদের আপনার সম্পর্কে আরও কিছু জানাতে পারেন। Case of Concern: Camille Camille’s case reveals major gaps in urgent placements, communication, and legal processes, after unsuitable emergency housing led to police involvement and hospital admissions. ১১ ডিসেম্বর, ২০২৫ Published: Read review National Review: John Smyth QC The CSCP Independent Scrutineer reviewed the Church of England's safeguarding practices to ensure robust protection for vulnerable individuals. ৮ এপ্রিল, ২০২৫ Published: Read review National Referral Mechanism The document provides information on the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) in the UK for identifying and supporting victims of modern slavery. ২১ নভেম্বর, ২০২৪ Published: Read review LCSPR: Serious Youth Violence This briefing summarises the thematic review which examined the cases of seven children/young people who were involved in the killings of three other children in 2021. The review highlights the voices of the affected families, practitioners, and community members. ২৬ জানুয়ারি, ২০২৪ Published: Read review Information Sharing Guidance for practitioners and organisations in understanding how to share personal information lawfully and appropriately, ensuring compliance with the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR. ২৪ আগস্ট, ২০২৩ Published: Read review LCSPR: Carl & Max This briefing examines the tragic case of 16-year-old Carl, who was fatally stabbed, and highlights issues such as homelessness, neglect, and a disrupted education. ২৫ ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০২২ Published: Read review LCSPR: Vulnerable Adolescents In the summer of 2017, three Croydon teenage boys known to social services lost their lives. The CSCP agreed to conduct a thematic review that would determine whether there were any patterns in the children’s experiences. ১৪ ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০১৯ Published: Read review Case of Concern: Christine This briefing draws on learning from an Appreciative Inquiry review into the experiences of “Christine”, a young person who became vulnerable following her primary carer’s imprisonment at the age of 14. ১৭ অক্টোবর, ২০২৫ Published: Read review Case of Concern: Carlos Our latest briefing outlines the case of a 15-year-old young person with a complex history, highlighting the importance of learning from timely, coordinated safeguarding responses. ৭ এপ্রিল, ২০২৫ Published: Read review Right Care, Right Person This briefing serves as a resource for safeguarding partners, local authorities, and police officers involved in Right Care Right Person for children. ১৯ জুলাই, ২০২৪ Published: Read review LCSPR: Chloe 'Chloe,' a 17-year-old who experienced early trauma and entered statutory care in her early teens, tragically lost her life. The inquest concluded her death was an accident, finding no clear intent to take her own life. ২০ অক্টোবর, ২০২৩ Published: Read review LCSPR: Jake The review of 17-year-old Jake’s case highlights challenges, including late entry to care, placement instability, and mental health concerns. Emphasising the need for earlier support and better responses to dual diagnosis. ২১ জুলাই, ২০২৩ Published: Read review LCSPR: Ben This review highlights lessons in engaging vulnerable young parents, mainly when domestic abuse is a concern. The missed opportunities to support the mother and her child, Ben, led to tragic outcomes. ২১ জানুয়ারি, ২০২২ Published: Read review Leadership, Trust & Accountability This briefing is intended for trustees, board members, senior leaders, and individuals in positions of trust. It also supports those who may have concerns about the behaviour or suitability of individuals in trusted roles. ৯ মে, ২০২৫ Published: Read review Case of Concern: Cassie This briefing reflects on a case about a child who experienced multiple incidents requiring intervention and highlighting the need for improved agency coordination. ২০ ডিসেম্বর, ২০২৪ Published: Read review LCSPR: Baby Eva Baby Eva, four months old, was hospitalised with a fracture; scans revealed multiple injuries of different ages. The review stresses the need for proactive risk assessment before and after birth. ৭ এপ্রিল, ২০২৪ Published: Read review Rapid Review: Intra-Familial CSA This briefing summarises key findings from a rapid review into a case of intra-familial child sexual abuse, highlighting areas for professional reflection and opportunities to strengthen safeguarding responses. ২৪ আগস্ট, ২০২৩ Published: Read review Unexplained Deaths (under 1s) This briefing explores recommendations from case reviews, emphasising the need for robust safeguarding practices and multi-agency collaboration to prevent future tragedies. ২১ জুলাই, ২০২২ Published: Read review LCSPR: Emily & Jack Following a tragic incident where a three-month-old baby girl, referred to as 'Emily', was killed by her mother, a serious case review was conducted and identified the need for improvements in local agency information sharing. ২১ জুন, ২০২০ Published: Read review

View CSCP annual reports to learn about our safeguarding progress, performance, and priorities in protecting children and young people in Croydon. Annual Reports আমি একটা অনুচ্ছেদ। এখানে ক্লিক করে নিজের লেখা যোগ করুন এবং আমাকে এডিট করুন। এটা সহজ। শুধু "Edit Text" এ ক্লিক করুন অথবা আপনার নিজস্ব কন্টেন্ট যোগ করতে এবং ফন্টে পরিবর্তন করতে আমাকে ডাবল ক্লিক করুন। আপনার পৃষ্ঠায় যেকোনো জায়গায় আমাকে টেনে আনতে দ্বিধা করবেন না। আমি আপনার জন্য একটি দুর্দান্ত জায়গা যেখানে আপনি গল্প বলতে পারেন এবং আপনার ব্যবহারকারীদের আপনার সম্পর্কে আরও কিছু জানাতে পারেন। CSCP Annual Report 2025/26 CSCP Annual Report CSCP Annual Report CSCP Annual Report 2024/25 CSCP Annual Report CSCP Annual Report SW London CDOP Annual Report 2024/25 SW London CDOP Annual Report SW London CDOP Annual Report Private Fostering Annual Report 2024/25 Private Fostering Annual Report Private Fostering Annual Report CDOP Annual Report 2023/24 CDOP Annual Report CDOP Annual Report LADO Annual Report 2023/24 LADO Annual Report LADO Annual Report

SPRs are commissioned when a child dies or is seriously harmed, identifying ways to strengthen safeguarding. Explore local and national lessons to improve policy and practice. The Safeguarding Practice Review Process The Review Group Purpose & Accountability Local Safeguarding Children Practice Reviews (LSCPRs) are commissioned when a child dies or is seriously harmed, to identify how safeguarding practices can be strengthened. While the learning is rooted in local experience, it often has wider significance for professionals working with children and families, as well as for government and policy development. Understanding systemic issues—and identifying where practice or policy needs to adapt—is vital to creating a responsive, learning-led safeguarding system. This work is led by the Review Group, which reports to the CSCP Executive Group through quarterly updates and Review Summaries. Roles & Responsibilities The Review Group is tasked to: Identify serious child safeguarding incidents where a review would raise issues of importance in Croydon Commission an oversee reviews for those cases they consider it appropriate Ensure that action plans are drawn up in response to reviews, and that reviews are diligently followed to enhance processes and improve outcomes for children and young people. Each Review Group member is tasked to: Take responsibility for the timely completion of the Rapid Review Information Request/IMRs/other documents required by the review coordinator. The forms may be completed by a relevant professional from their organisation, but the Review Group member is responsible for making contact with that professional as well as the quality and standard of the report. Liaising with the professionals from their organisation, who had contact with the child or family subject to the review, to ensure feedback about the purpose and outcomes of any review. Liaising with relevant professionals within their organisation, to determine whether they should attend review panels or other meetings (agreement from the Chair of these meetings will need to be sought by the coordinator) Informing their organisation’s press office and ensuring any communication about publication of any review is shared with their organisation. Prepare for all meetings by reading papers in advance and, by sending papers or reports in accordance with deadlines set by the coordinators. Attend review meetings or ensure a proxy of similar seniority attends in their place. Follow up actions arising from meetings to be addressed between meetings and in accordance with deadlines set by coordinators. Be involved in safeguarding learning and practice improvement, Take responsibility to influence their own agency/service safeguarding learning approach and implementation To report on the sharing of/impact of learning in their organisation Membership & Quoracy Membership will be formed of representatives of the three statutory safeguarding partners plus representation from other relevant agencies as follows: Introduction Roles & Responsibilities Rotating Chair from CSC/Police/Health Rotating Deputy Chair from CSC/Police/Health CAMHS / South London and Maudsley (SLAM) Associate Director Safegaurding Lead Croydon Health Services (CHS) Named Nurse for Safeguarding Croydon Council: Housing Public Health Principle Independent Scrutineer Young scrutineer (post currently vacant) Croydon Council: CYPE Head of Service: Early Help & Children's Social Care QA / Performance Improvement Manager Croydon Integrated Care Board (ICB) Designated Doctor for Child Protection Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Children Metropolitan Police Detective Inspector CSCP Business Team Project Officer Business support Croydon Council: CYPE Youth Justice Service Director of Education Service Manager Early Years / PAIRS Croydon Council: Housing Safeguarding Lead (Post currently vacant) Review Oversight Quoracy is achieved by the attendance of: Croydon Children’s Social Care, Croydon Health (ICB), & the Police. Frequency & Standing Items Frequency - The Safeguarding Practice Review Group will meet six times a year / bi-monthly. Standing Items include: Summary of Reviews Partnership updates Confirmation of previous minutes & actions. The Meeting Schedule (circulated with papers) The Chair is rotated, agreed in advance as per the Meeting Schedule These terms of reference should be updated every 2 years. Review Oversight The Review Group has oversight of: Stage 3 and above Escalations Case of Concerns (CoC) Rapid Reviews (RR) Local Safeguarding Children Practice Reviews (LSCPR) The L&D Project Officer produces a bi-monthly report which summarises all reviews, the current progress as well as provides data to support greater understanding of the themes and features of safeguarding reviews. This oversight will influence the training offered by the CSCP. The Review Group will agree the methodology to be used for each review; this decision may be influenced by: Known areas of improvement needed, including where those improvements have been previously identified. Re-occurring themes in safeguarding and promotion of the welfare of children. Concerns regarding effectiveness of agencies working together and associated procedures. Concern about the actions of a single agency and relevant procedures. Where there has been no agency involvement, and this gives safeguarding partners cause for concern. Where more than one local authority, police area, or ICB is involved, particularly where families have moved around. Recommendations from the National Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel to undertake a review. The CSCP conduct statutory and non-statutory reviews depending on the severity of harm and the likelihood of eliciting new learning to support better practice and outcomes for children. CSCP Review Process Escalation Policy Escalation Policy The Escalation Policy is designed to help professionals who encounter disagreements about a course of action. It provides a framework for managing necessary conversations and escalating unresolved issues. View full policy here: CSCP Escalation and Resolution Policy⭧ The CSCP tracks all escalations that reach Stage 3 . Whether the matter is resolved at this stage or not, it is essential that a copy of the escalation is sent to CSCP@croydon.gov.uk. Review Types This section sets out the structured process for managing a Case of Concern, detailing how agencies can initiate referrals using the designated form and outlining the subsequent escalation pathways. It also provides comprehensive guidance on the procedures for Serious Incident Notifications (SIN), Rapid Reviews (RRs), and Local Safeguarding Children Practice Reviews (LSCPRs), supporting professionals to navigate each stage of the child safeguarding review framework with confidence and clarity. SIN RR and LCSPR Decisions The following guidance describes the decision-making process for Serious Incident Notifications, Rapid Reviews and Local Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews. View full guidance here: CSCP Review Decision Guidance ⭧ Review Types CSCP Case Decisions (COC) Case of Concern A Case of Concern is identified when a case does not meet the threshold for a Significant Incident Notification (SIN) or a LSCPR but still presents valuable opportunities for multi-agency learning. These cases typically involve near-miss safeguarding incidents where serious practice issues are identified, though the matter is not considered time-critical. This process helps to ensure that even lower-threshold cases contribute to continuous learning and improvement across the safeguarding system. To raise a case of concern please refer to the Case of Concern Policy: click here to download referral form ⭧ (SIN) Serious Incident Notification A SIN is a statutory duty on the local authority when certain criteria are met. 16C (1) of the Children Act 2004 (as amended by the Children and Social Work Act 2017) states: Where a local authority in England knows or suspects that a child has been abused or neglected, the local authority must notify the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel if: (a) the child dies or is seriously harmed in the local authority's area (b) while normally resident in the local authority's area, the child dies or is seriously harmed outside England The death of a Care leavers under the age of 25 must also be notified, this notification does not automatically trigger a Rapid Review and may require liaison with the Croydon Adult Safeguarding Board (CSAB). Though the responsibility to notify rests on the local authority, it is for all three safeguarding partners to agree which incidents should be notified in their local area. SINs should be notified to the National Panel within 5 days of the local authority becoming aware of the incident that led to the child death or serious harm. (RR) Rapid Review If a SIN is reported for a child under 18, there must be a Rapid Review within 15 working days. A SIN always results in Rapid Review. The purpose of the Rapid Review is to: a) gather the facts about the case, as far as they can be readily established b) discuss whether any immediate action is needed to ensure children’s safety and share any learning appropriately c) consider the potential for identifying improvements to safeguard and promote the welfare of children d) decide what steps they should take next, including whether to undertake a full LSCPR Even if the criteria for a SPR are met, commissioning one is not mandatory. The Rapid Review Process is coordinated by the CSCP Business Team. Professionals are expected to complete the required template within the specified timescales, attend the Rapid Review meeting, and ensure the learning is shared with their respective agencies. (LCSPR) Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review LSCPRs are about promoting and sharing information about improvements, both within the area and potentially beyond, so the safeguarding partners must publish the report, unless they consider it inappropriate to do so. The CSCP Business Team will co-ordinate the SPR process. Professionals will be required to complete relevant templates, attend panel meetings specific to the review and share the learning with their agencies. Find a LCSPR here

Guidance for professionals on making safeguarding referrals to Croydon MASH and understanding the London Continuum of Need, ensuring referrals are consistent, evidence based and aligned to the correct threshold. Thresholds and Referrals If you work with children, young people, or families in Croydon, it’s important to know how and when to make a referral when concerns arise. What is a Threshold Thresholds help professionals decide what level of support or intervention a child or family may need. They ensure concerns are assessed consistently across agencies by setting out the different levels of need, harm, and risk, and helping practitioners determine whether Early Help, targeted intervention, or statutory social care involvement is appropriate. Understanding thresholds is essential before making a referral to the Croydon Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH). A referral is made when a professional shares concerns about a child’s welfare or safety that may meet the threshold for statutory assessment. Referrals may be based on: Observed harm or risk of harm Concerns about neglect, abuse, or unmet needs Escalation from Early Help or support services The MASH brings together professionals from social care, police, health, education, and other services to share information, assess risk, and make timely decisions. Applying thresholds correctly helps ensure children receive the right help at the right time. Understanding Thresholds of Need Before making a referral, it is important to understand the level of need or risk. Across London, professionals use a shared framework called the Continuum of Need, which helps determine the most appropriate support for each child and family. Practitioners in Croydon should refer to the London Safeguarding Continuum of Need Matrix to identify the correct threshold before submitting a referral. This ensures that decisions are consistent, evidence based and aligned to the level of need identified. Using the matrix supports effective professional judgement and strengthens the quality of information shared with the MASH. View the Threshold Continuum of Need Matrix ↗ Thresholds Continuum of Need Matrix Title Description Example Level 1 - Universal Needs met by universal services such as schools, GPs, and Family Hubs. Child is healthy, attending school regularly, supported by parents. Level 2 - Early Help Emerging worries that can be addressed with targeted support. Family experiencing difficulties with housing or parenting. Level 3 - Child in Need Complex or multiple needs requiring a statutory Children’s Social Care assessment (Section 17, Children Act 1989). Ongoing neglect concerns, or a child needing coordinated multi-agency support. Level 4 - Child Protection Acute risk of significant harm requiring urgent intervention (Section 47, Children Act 1989). Child experiencing physical or sexual abuse, or severe neglect. Making Effective Referrals in Croydon Your first point of call for understanding thresholds and making a referral Effective safeguarding relies on professionals and community organisations recognising concerns early, understanding levels of need, and knowing how to act. To support this, the CSCP has developed the Referral Guidance Toolkit, a practical resource designed to help you navigate the referral process with confidence. This toolkit should be your first point of call when you are considering making a referral to the MASH. It brings together essential information on thresholds of need, signs of harm, professional curiosity, and the key components of a high-quality referral. Whether you work in health, education, early years, youth services, the voluntary sector, faith communities, or any other organisation supporting children and families, this toolkit offers clear, accessible guidance tailored for Croydon’s multi-agency workforce. What the toolkit will help you do Understand and apply the London Child Protection Procedures Thresholds of Need within a Croydon context. Identify when a concern requires Early Help, targeted support, or statutory social care involvement. Know what information MASH needs to make safe, timely decisions. Strengthen your professional judgment and avoid over-reliance on copying threshold descriptors. Record concerns clearly, factually, and proportionately. Improve the quality and consistency of referrals across all agencies, large and small. Why this toolkit matters High-quality referrals directly impact the timeliness and effectiveness of safeguarding responses. Clear, well-evidenced information enables MASH to apply thresholds correctly, assess risk, and allocate the right support. For smaller organisations who may not hold detailed records, the toolkit provides practical tips on what to include, how to gather essential information, and how to articulate concerns in a way that supports safe decision-making. Download the Referral Guidance Toolkit (PPTX) (click on image to enlarge) What’s included The CSCP Referral Guidance Toolkit is provided as an easy-to-use resource available as a PowerPoint or PDF, designed for personal reference, staff training, and supervision discussions. It can be used flexibly within teams to build confidence, support reflective practice, and ensure consistent application of thresholds across all agencies. The toolkit contains: A clear explanation of thresholds and how they apply Guidance on recognising concerns and applying professional curiosity Step-by-step instructions for making a MASH referral What to do if you do not have complete information Examples of poor and high-quality referrals A simple decision-making flowchart Guidance for smaller organisations, youth settings, and community groups Key contacts, follow-up expectations, and good recording practice A glossary of services and teams Links to additional resources, including threshold guidance and professional curiosity training Who should use it This toolkit is designed for: Practitioners making referrals as part of their role New starters completing safeguarding induction Organisations wanting to strengthen internal safeguarding procedures Any professional working with or supporting children, young people, or families in Croydon

Review the terms and conditions governing the use of the Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership (CSCP) website and its resources. শর্তাবলী Introduction The Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership (CSCP) is committed to delivering high quality, targeted multi agency safeguarding training for professionals working with children, young people and families in Croydon. Our training programme is designed to: Strengthen professional confidence Enhance multi agency practice Improve safeguarding decision making Promote consistency in safeguarding standards across agencies These Terms and Conditions outline expectations for learners and organisations, including charging, cancellations and participation requirements. CSCP reviews these conditions periodically. 1. Bookings 1.1 By booking, delegates confirm they: Have manager/organisation approval to attend Accept the Charging and Cancellation Policy Meet the target audience criteria (see training levels ) 1.2 Account requirements: Each delegate must create an individual account using a unique work email Shared inboxes are not permitted All profile information must be accurate and kept up to date 1.3 Key notes: Bookings close 3 working days before the course (please check individual bookings) Multiple bookings under one email are prohibited Misuse may result in delayed certification or access restrictions 1.4 Selecting the correct organisation The CSCP training platform is funded by the Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership and includes access for both partner and non-partner organisations. Selecting the correct organisation type during registration is essential because it determines eligibility for free or discounted training. Incorrect organisation selection may lead to reassigning accounts, temporary suspension, incorrect charging or delays in issuing certificates. Non-partner organisations incur a booking fee that contributes to maintaining the quality of the programme, covering trainer expertise, platform development and administration. Learners must check with their manager or training coordinator before selecting an organisation type. 2. Eligibility 2.1 Free access is provided to: Croydon Council staff (including approved foster carers) Croydon-based schools Local NHS and public health services Metropolitan Police 2.2 Non-Croydon Organisations/Individuals All non-Croydon based organisations will be charged the full course fee. Local voluntary, community, and faith-based organisations will receive a subsidised fee, with a 50% discount applied. Payment is required at the time of booking to secure placement Proof of employment may be requested for fee waiver eligibility Failure to provide documentation when requested may result in: Cancellation of booking Application of full course charges 2.3 Non-Attendance Consequences for Eligible Practitioners: CSCP partner organisations who are eligible for free training who: Fail to attend a session without 5 working days' notice, or Arrive late (>10 minutes)/leave early without approval will: Have their name logged in CSCP records and shared with department leads Have the full course fee invoiced to their department/organisation 3. Group Bookings 3.1 CSCP does not offer: Group/block booking discounts Large group bookings for non-eligible organisations 3.2 Exceptions: Maximum 5 places per organisation may be considered (case-by-case basis) 4. Charges and Payment 4.1 Course fees (subject to change): Introduction (T&Cs) Bookings Eligibility Fees Training Type CSCP Partner (Croydon Council, NHS, Met Police) VCS & Faith Organisations Non-Partners / External Agencies In-Person: Full Day (Level 4+ / Specialist) Free £47.50 £95 In-Person: Full Day (Standard) Free £32.50 £65 In-Person: Half Day Free £20 £40 eLearning: Foundation Free £10 £10 eLearning: Specialist Modules Free £12.50 £25 Cancellations Participation 4.2 Where applicable - invoices are payable within 30 days. 4.3 eLearning Completion Requirement CSCP partner organisations benefit from free access to designated eLearning courses. To ensure fair use of training resources, all eLearning courses must be completed within six months of enrolment. Where a learner who is eligible for free training does not complete an eLearning course within six months, CSCP reserves the right to recover the applicable course fee from the learner's agency, service, or department. This charge will be applied unless an extension has been agreed in advance by CSCP. Managers are responsible for supporting staff to complete training within the required timeframe. Persistent non-completion may lead to restrictions on future course bookings and monitoring by the learner's organisation. 5. Cancellations, Transfers & Non-Attendance 5.1 Charging Policy - All no-shows: Eligible practitioners: Internal departmental charge (as above see 2.3) Fee-paying delegates: Full fee forfeited (non-refundable) 5.2 Fees apply for: No-show without notice Late arrival/early departure (without approval) 5.3 Fees are: Non-refundable Non-transferable between learners 5.4 One-time transfer permitted for non-attendees (request within 5 working days). 5.5 Fair access policies: No substitutions – all learners must book individually CSCP may correct organisation details to ensure eligibility fairness and audit compliance 6. Attendance and Participation 6.1 General Requirements Full attendance is mandatory for certification. Delegates who miss any portion of the session (late arrival/early departure) must rebook to complete the course. 6.2 Online Sessions Technical Requirements: Learners must join from a desktop/laptop (mobile devices are not advised due to functionality limitations). Ensure your device meets the platform’s technical requirements (e.g., Zoom/Teams) before the session. Joining Instructions: Sessions begin at the advertised time. Learners will be admitted by the trainer from the virtual waiting room; learners should wait in the virtual lobby until admitted into the session. It is the learner’s responsibility to: Test their tech (audio/video/internet) in advance. Check emails for joining links 24 hours prior. Log in 5 minutes early to troubleshoot issues. Participation Rules: Cameras must remain on throughout to encourage engagement. Delegates with cameras off without prior notice may be removed. Microphones should be muted unless speaking. 6.3 In-Person Sessions Arrival & Registration: Learners must arrive 10 minutes before the start time to complete registration. Late arrivals (>10 minutes) may be refused entry. Location Details: Venue information (e.g., room number, accessibility instructions) will be provided in the booking confirmation and reminders. Bring: Any pre-course materials listed in the joining instructions. 6.4 Trainer Discretion Trainers may refuse entry/admission to delegates who: Fail to meet technical requirements (online). Arrive late (in-person) or disrupt the session. Persistent non-compliance may result in booking restrictions. 6.5 Sensitive Content, Confidentiality and Use of AI Some training sessions may include real case studies or scenarios that explore sensitive safeguarding issues. These may be distressing for some delegates. Learners are expected to use their discretion and seek support if needed before, during or after the session. All sessions are confidential. Delegates must not record any part of the session under any circumstances. This includes: Screen recording Using mobile phone cameras Using recording software or apps Transcribing tools Any AI‑powered tools that capture, process or store session content The use of AI tools during sessions is strictly prohibited. Any breach of these requirements may result in removal from the session, withholding of certification, or suspension of booking privileges. 7. Post-Training & Certification Policy 7.1 Eligibility Requirements: Certificates are issued only to individual learners who: Attend the full session (no late arrivals/early departures) Complete all course evaluations Meet participation standards (e.g., camera on for virtual sessions) 7.2 Group Attendance Restrictions: Learners joining via group connections (e.g., shared device/log-in) will not receive certification. Each delegate must: Join from a separate device Use their personal learning account Be visible/audible throughout the session 7.3 Verification Process: Trainers will monitor attendance logs and participation. Suspected group attendees will be contacted for verification. 7.4 Non-Compliance: Violations may result in: Withheld certificates Suspension of booking privileges 7.5 Follow-up: Delegates may be contacted within 8 weeks for impact feedback Line managers may also be consulted 8. Event Cancellation by CSCP 8.1 CSCP will notify delegates promptly if cancelling due to unforeseen circumstances. 8.2 We are not liable for travel/time costs incurred. 9. Data Protection 9.1 Data is processed per our Privacy Policy . 9.2 Training records may be shared with employers for quality assurance. 10. Policy Breaches 10.1 Consequences may include: Suspended booking privileges Employer referral Financial charges 📩 Contact: cscptraining@croydon.gov.uk Data Protection

Learn how the CSCP website collects, uses, and protects your personal information in accordance with data protection laws and best practice. শর্তাবলী As part of our commitment to protecting children and ensuring their safety, we utilise cookies on our website to enhance the user experience and improve our services. We will provide you with a comprehensive description of the types of cookies we use, including information about our AI chatbot, cookie management options, storage duration, and links to our privacy policy. Our website uses both session and persistent cookies. Session cookies are temporary and are deleted once you close your browser, while persistent cookies remain on your device for a specified period or until you manually delete them. These cookies are essential for the proper functioning of our website, including enabling you to navigate between pages efficiently and remembering your preferences. One of the features that make your experience on our website more interactive and personalised is our AI chatbot. This chatbot uses cookies to remember your previous interactions and provide you with relevant information in real-time. By using cookies, the AI chatbot can tailor its responses to better assist you with your queries and ensure a seamless user experience. The CSCP respect your privacy and understand the importance of giving you control over your cookie preferences. You have the option to manage your cookie settings through our cookie consent tool, allowing you to accept or decline specific categories of cookies. By adjusting your preferences, you can choose which types of cookies you want to enable and customize your browsing experience on our website. The storage duration of cookies on your device may vary depending on the type of cookie used. We ensure that our cookies are only stored for the necessary time required to fulfil their purposes and improve your interaction with our website. For more information on how we collect, use, and protect your personal data, please refer to our privacy policy below. If you have any further questions or concerns about cookies or our privacy practices, please do not hesitate to contact us. Your privacy and security are paramount to us at Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership, and we are committed to providing a transparent and safe online environment for all our users. শর্তাবলী The Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership (CSCP) collects and processes your personal data, (including special categories of personal data) in accordance with our obligations under the Data Protection Act 2018 and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The Croydon Safeguarding Children Partnership conducts regular Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) to ensure data processing on this website complies with UK GDPR and protects user privacy. We respect your right to privacy and are committed to maintaining it. We only collect information necessary to enable us to deliver our services and store and process your personal information in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (EU) 2016/679. The information we collect CSCP also collects information related to the delivery of projects, learning events, newsletter subscriptions and training. We will also collect information from you, if you complete any other forms on our site or if you contact us with comments or specific requests. This information may include: your name work address email address and/or telephone number job role service area or organisation line manager contact details (this only applicable if registering for training) We will only ask for information that will help us with auditing activities or to measure the impact of training. In most cases, this does not require the recording of personal information. Why we collect your information Your data is used for the purpose of: carrying out statutory auditing activities producing statistics and reports to research and plan training programmes assessing performance and set targets for service improvement monitoring and evaluating the quality of service we provide reviewing the impact of programmes delivered How we use your information The data you provide may be accessible to the suppliers of our event management and learning management systems. Anonymised data may also be shared with: statutory partners to analyse and evaluate the impact of our programmes external programme funders programme delivery partners We will not add your email address to any external mailing lists, and we will not disclose these details to third parties unless permitted or required by law. We will keep your email address on file internally and may contact you regarding your training account. You will only receive marketing emails relating to CSCP learning events and monthly newsletter if you specifically sign up for these notifications. Your emails to us may be forwarded to CSCP business team to action, unless your email specifically does not consent to this. Depending on how we are processing your personal data will determine the legal basis for processing. To perform a function or provide a service required by statute (Article 6(1)(e) GDPR) To comply with a legal obligation (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR) Where the processing is necessary for the performance of a contract (Article 1(b) GDPR) With your explicit consent (Articles 6(1)(a) and 9(2)(a) GDPR) Your rights are: to be informed; our privacy notice is one of the ways we try and let you know how data is handled to access your personal information (exceptions apply in certain circumstances) to update inaccurate data to restrict processing of any inaccurate data to object to certain processing such as direct marketing to data portability in cases where consent is given or processed by automated means to erase data if Croydon council no longer has a lawful basis or legitimate grounds for processing it to withdraw your consent when it has previously been given where required to complain about data handling How the CSCP protects data The CSCP takes the security of your data seriously, The CSCP has internal policies and controls in place to try to ensure that your data is not lost, accidentally destroyed, misused, or disclosed and is not accessed except by its employees in the performance of their duties. Croydon council is your data controller. If you want any further information, email, DPO@croydon.gov.uk or telephone 020 8726 6000 and ask to speak with the Data Protection Officer or view our corporate privacy statement .

Information on managing allegations against professionals working with children, and how to contact Croydon’s LADO. Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO) Managing allegations against adults who work with Children The LADO is responsible for managing allegations against adults who work with children. This includes overseeing investigations and working with multi-agencies including the Police and Children's Social Care to ensure fair and thorough processes are followed. The LADO provides a comprehensive and impartial process for all parties. The Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO) must be alerted when concerns arise regarding a professional or volunteer working with children has: Behaved in a way that has harmed or may have harmed a child. Possibly committed a criminal offence against or related to a child. Behaved towards a child or children in a way that indicates they may pose a risk of harm to children. Behaved in a way that indicates they may not be suitable to work with children. If the allegation meets any of the above criteria, the employer or agency MUST report it to the LADO within one working day. The LADO Referral All documents relating to allegations against adults who work with children should be retained in a secure place and should only be shared with the express agreement of the LADO. Do ensure that urgent medical treatment is sought if required, and that the child is supported. Please record the information and facts given to you as soon as possible. Do not discuss or inform the member of staff concerned that this referral is being made unless advised to by the Local Authority Designated Officer. It is not your duty to investigate the allegation as this may lead to evidence being lost/contaminated or may even put the child, or others, at risk. The referral form is designed for professionals, families, and members of the public. Please state the allegation/safeguarding incident in the description section and the LADO will contact you if more is required. Croydon LADO Contact Details: Jane Rowe Email: lado@croydon.gov.uk Tel: 0208 726 6000 ext. 24817 Managing allegations Download LADO referral form Leadership, Trust & Accountability 7-Minute Briefing: Leadership, Trust, and Accountability This 7-minute briefing is a concise, yet powerful resource designed to reinforce the critical role of leadership, trust, and accountability in safeguarding vulnerable individuals, particularly children and young people. Why This Matters Safeguarding failures in trusted institutions, such as the Church of England’s mishandling of abuse allegations and highlight the catastrophic consequences of weak leadership and systemic neglect. This briefing distils key lessons from past failures and provides actionable steps to ensure your organisation upholds the highest standards of safeguarding. Download 7 Minute Briefing